What does high-quality research say about the environmental effects from radio waves

ose 334 studies, only a few were deemed good quality by the authors.
Good quality studies used rigorous scientific methods such as appropriate exposure assessment and suitable comparison/control groups.
The poor-quality studies in the paper had flaws such as having no controls in the experiments, using poor radiation exposure assessment, and not considering other environmental factors like pollution.
ARPANSA's Dr. Chris Brzozek was the review's lead author.
"While the good quality studies add to the international scientific community's consensus on radio wave effects on plants and animals, the number of those studies was limited and that's why we need more research to resolve any doubts," Dr. Brzozek said.
"It is ARPANSA's assessment and the international scientific consensus that there are no health effects to plants and animals from low level radio wave exposure."

바로가기